We are now 2.5 months into "Covid time". The final quarter of my daughter's sophomore year of high school was totally online. Mass was online/TV only for eight week; now we are allowed to have the church 25% full, but my parish has a lot of old people and we haven't come close to the allowed number.
When the state moved to "phase 1" re-opening the middle of May we were told to be back in the office. Honestly, I'd pretty much gone back earlier, it was just easier--and I liked seeing other people.
Memorial Day weekend my husband and I went to Long Beach Ms. where we at in a restaurant and then we visited my brother and went out in his boat. It was nice to get out and seem somewhat normal. They are supposed to decide tomorrow whether we can move to "phase II" or whether we need to spend more time at Phase I. Using an eyeball estimate, deaths are down from the beginning of the month, hospitalization is down a lot and cases may be down a little. Phase II will allow daycamps and daycare to re-open which will allow some parents to head back to the office. Right now the parking lot in my building is quite empty.
Masks are now the order of the day. I keep one with me. If a mask-wearer comes in my office, I pull mine up. I don't generally wear it in the hallways at work--we are quite separated. I wear it in stores or other public places were I am apt to get close to people, but those "stand here" stickers, tape markings etc. have become ubiquitous. We are asked to wear one at Mass.
My daughter and my son both work in the hospitality industry and both are laid off with no return in sight. My husband hasn't had a bonus since this all started, but his bonus is a nice extra, not what pays the bills here. I've been really busy at work and have even gotten some overtime. Financially my family is doing okay but I wish the kids were working. My daughter and her boyfriend took a two week trip to Tennessee--the owner of their company owns some vacation cabins and he traded them accommodations and food for some work freshening them up. They had fun but she's glad to be home.
All in all, this has been a nuisance, not a tragedy in my family but I'm ready for it to be over.
Sunday, May 31, 2020
About the Book:
Adele and Justine have never been close. Born twenty years apart, Justine was already an adult when Addie was born. The sisters love each other but they don’t really know each other.
When Addie dropped out of university to care for their ailing parents, Justine, a successful lawyer, covered the expenses. It was the best arrangement at the time but now that their parents are gone, the future has changed dramatically for both women.
Addie had great plans for her life but has been worn down by the pressures of being a caregiver and doesn’t know how to live for herself. And Justine’s success has come at a price. Her marriage is falling apart despite her best efforts.
Neither woman knows how to start life over but both realize they can and must support each other the way only sisters can. Together they find the strength to accept their failures and overcome their challenges. Happiness is within reach, if only they have the courage to fight for it.
Set in the stunning coastal town of Half Moon Bay, California, Robyn Carr’s new novel examines the joys of sisterhood and the importance of embracing change.
My Comments:
All of us have times in our lives where things seem to pretty much go on as "normal" and, unfortunately, times when change is forced upon us. Even when the change ends up being for the better, most of us would rather call the shots than to have situations or other people make us change.
Adele has been living her life for others for her whole adult life. She dropped out of college and moved home to care for sick parents. Her life hasn't been bad, and she could have chosen to leave, but she didn't. However, she's never been in a position where she felt she was making career, school or relationship decisions. Now her parents are gone, and she plans to make plans when she decides what she thinks she wants--yea, she isn't doing a whole lot.
Her sister, on the other hand, has a full life--a high-flying career, two kids, a husband, etc. Until that implodes. Now both sisters are trying to put their lives back together which, in part, means deciding what they want--and yes, WHO they want is part of it too.
As with many of Robyn Carr's books, the characters are the strength of this book and through their eyes we see that even people whose lives appear perfect often have problems the world doesn't see. I cheered for these sisters as they charted their new lives an believe you will too.
Thanks to the publisher for making a review copy available via NetGalley. Grade: B.
Thanks to the publisher for making a review copy available via NetGalley. Grade: B.
Monday, May 25, 2020
Some Covid-19 stats and My Comments
I've been reviewing the Covid-19 states published in my local paper and slicing and dicing them and I'd like to share a few with you all.
Just so you know something of my pre-suppositions and prejudices etc., I'm a relatively conservative Republican who doesn't really care for President Trump. I just consider the alternatives presented to be much worse. However, I do not see this disease as made-up crisis designed to torpedo him (though I do see his opponents trying to use it as such).
I believe human life is important, however I question the those who decry a return to openness by complaining that more lives will be lost and that we are prioritizing money over people. Life is a risk, the question is how much risk are we willing to bear. In the 1970's the speed limit was lowered to 55 mph to save fuel. When that was no longer an issue, it was kept that way for years because it saved lives, but eventually people had their way and the state were allowed to set their own speed limits. Yes, the death toll went up, but I doubt many would vote to reduce them.
My car insurance company has sent me refunds the last two months--it seems that with everyone staying home, car accidents have decreased. Maybe we should stay on lock-down forever to keep people from dying in car accidents? This weekend I went out in the boat with my brother. I'm guessing I took a much bigger risk by getting in that boat than I did by being close to him, someone who doesn't live with me, yet while there are plenty of people who would question my judgment in being close to him, few would consider me reckless for going on a boat ride.
I think a few week lockdown to let the doctors and hospitals get a handle on this thing was probably a good idea; however, the longer it goes on the more I question whether it is worth it.
So, using the format above and assuming that 90% of nursing home residents are over 70 (my estimate no figures to back it up, but my guess is that more than 90% are over 70), let's do some math.
There have been 6625 cases in people over 70. If there were 4,000 nursing home cases and 90% of them were in the elderly, that means that about 3600 cases were in nursing home residents over 70. That leaves 3025 cases for the non-residents. In percents, about 10.5% of the overall cases were in nursing home residents over 70 and about 8.85% were in those over 70, not in nursing homes.
There have been 987 deaths among nursing home residents. That is 38.1 percent of overall deaths. If 90% of those deaths were to people over 70, then 888 of the 1729 deaths to those over 70 were in nursing homes. (51.3% of elderly deaths were to nursing home residents)
Those aged 70+ and in a nursing home are are (11% * 5%* 90%) of the population (0.495%), 10.5% of the diagnosed cases and 34.3% of the dead. If there were 3600 infected people and 888 deaths, those getting it had a 26% change of dying.
Those aged 70+ and NOT in a nursing home are are 10.45% (11% * 95%) of the population and represent about 3025 cases, which is about 8% of the cases. There have been 1729 deaths to those over 70. If we subtract the 888 to nursing home residents over 70, we get 841, which is 33% of the dead. 27.8% of those over 70, not in a nursing home, who got it, died.
Just so you know something of my pre-suppositions and prejudices etc., I'm a relatively conservative Republican who doesn't really care for President Trump. I just consider the alternatives presented to be much worse. However, I do not see this disease as made-up crisis designed to torpedo him (though I do see his opponents trying to use it as such).
I believe human life is important, however I question the those who decry a return to openness by complaining that more lives will be lost and that we are prioritizing money over people. Life is a risk, the question is how much risk are we willing to bear. In the 1970's the speed limit was lowered to 55 mph to save fuel. When that was no longer an issue, it was kept that way for years because it saved lives, but eventually people had their way and the state were allowed to set their own speed limits. Yes, the death toll went up, but I doubt many would vote to reduce them.
My car insurance company has sent me refunds the last two months--it seems that with everyone staying home, car accidents have decreased. Maybe we should stay on lock-down forever to keep people from dying in car accidents? This weekend I went out in the boat with my brother. I'm guessing I took a much bigger risk by getting in that boat than I did by being close to him, someone who doesn't live with me, yet while there are plenty of people who would question my judgment in being close to him, few would consider me reckless for going on a boat ride.
I think a few week lockdown to let the doctors and hospitals get a handle on this thing was probably a good idea; however, the longer it goes on the more I question whether it is worth it.
Who Is Getting Covid-19, and Who Is Dying?
I've been drafting this post for almost a month. The initial figures shown were as of May 5. While I can't find the site I used to get the population distribution, it was as of 2017 and represented the population of the whole U.S. I have no idea whether Louisiana is similar to the U.S. as a whole or whether there has been a notable change since 2017. Anyway, I looked at what percent of the overall population was represented by each age group, what percent of the Covid-19 cases occurred in that age group, what percent of the deaths are in that age group, and what percent of the people that age who tested positive ended up dying. On May 25, I updated the figures. As of May 5 I foundAge 0-19:
Children make up 25% of the population but only 1.3% of those who have tested positive. They make up less than 1% of the dead. Of those 18 and under who tested positive, 0.2% died.
Update: Another child died, which increased kids' % of total cases to 2%. Kids make up 0.07% of the dead and of the diagnosed kids 0.24% died.
Update: Another child died, which increased kids' % of total cases to 2%. Kids make up 0.07% of the dead and of the diagnosed kids 0.24% died.
Age 20-29:
People age 20-29 make up 14% of the population but only 11.6% of those who have tested positive. Only 0.3% of the dead were in their 20's. Of those who tested positive, 0.2% died.
Update: Now those in their 20's make up 14% of positive test and 0.34% of the dead. 0.17% of the diagnosed died.
Update: Now those in their 20's make up 14% of positive test and 0.34% of the dead. 0.17% of the diagnosed died.
Age 30-39:
13.3% of the population is in their 30's, but they comprise 15.8% of those who have tested positive. Only 1.8% of the dead were in their 30's. Of those who tested positive, 0.7% died.
Update: 17.2% of positive tests were to people in their 30's. 1.75% of the dead were in their 30's and of those who tested positive, 0.76% died.
Update: 17.2% of positive tests were to people in their 30's. 1.75% of the dead were in their 30's and of those who tested positive, 0.76% died.
Age 40-49:
Though people in their 40's make up 12.38% of the population, they comprise 17% of those who tested positive and 3.8 % of the dead. Of 40-somethings who tested positive, 1.5% died.
Update: 18.13% of positives were to 40-somethings. 3.7% of the dead were in their forties and of those who tested positive, 1.54% died.
Update: 18.13% of positives were to 40-somethings. 3.7% of the dead were in their forties and of those who tested positive, 1.54% died.
Age 50-59:
Those in their 50's are 13.1% of population but 19% of those who tested positive. They make up 8.6% of the dead and of those who tested positive, 3% died.
Update: 20.1% of positive tests were to folks in their 50's. 8.95%of the dead were that age. 3.3% of the people who tested positive died.
Update: 20.1% of positive tests were to folks in their 50's. 8.95%of the dead were that age. 3.3% of the people who tested positive died.
Age 60-69:
While those age 60-69 make up 11.3% of population they make up 16.6 % of those who tested positive and 18.2% of the dead. Of those who tested positive, 7.4% died.
Update: 16.8% of those who tested positive were in their 60's, and 18.35% of the dead. 8.16% of those who tested positive died.
Update: 16.8% of those who tested positive were in their 60's, and 18.35% of the dead. 8.16% of those who tested positive died.
Age 70+
Those aged 70+ are 11% of the population but 25% of those who tested positive. and 68 % of the dead have been elderly and of those in this age group who tested positive, 25% died.
Update: 19.1% of those who have tested positive are older than 70. 66.77 of the dead are. 26.2% of those diagnosed died.
Update: 19.1% of those who have tested positive are older than 70. 66.77 of the dead are. 26.2% of those diagnosed died.
While these numbers clearly show that this disease is most dangerous to the old, I found another statistic in the paper to be interesting: As of May 13, 863 of the state's 2315 deaths were nursing home residents. According to this website, 85% of nursing home residents are 75 or older, and about 5% of the elderly are in nursing homes at any one time. As of May 25, 987 deaths were to nursing home residents and there had been about 4000 infections. The total number of deaths in the state was 2585.
So, using the format above and assuming that 90% of nursing home residents are over 70 (my estimate no figures to back it up, but my guess is that more than 90% are over 70), let's do some math.
There have been 6625 cases in people over 70. If there were 4,000 nursing home cases and 90% of them were in the elderly, that means that about 3600 cases were in nursing home residents over 70. That leaves 3025 cases for the non-residents. In percents, about 10.5% of the overall cases were in nursing home residents over 70 and about 8.85% were in those over 70, not in nursing homes.
There have been 987 deaths among nursing home residents. That is 38.1 percent of overall deaths. If 90% of those deaths were to people over 70, then 888 of the 1729 deaths to those over 70 were in nursing homes. (51.3% of elderly deaths were to nursing home residents)
Those aged 70+ and in a nursing home are are (11% * 5%* 90%) of the population (0.495%), 10.5% of the diagnosed cases and 34.3% of the dead. If there were 3600 infected people and 888 deaths, those getting it had a 26% change of dying.
Those aged 70+ and NOT in a nursing home are are 10.45% (11% * 95%) of the population and represent about 3025 cases, which is about 8% of the cases. There have been 1729 deaths to those over 70. If we subtract the 888 to nursing home residents over 70, we get 841, which is 33% of the dead. 27.8% of those over 70, not in a nursing home, who got it, died.
About the Curve
Every day NOLA.com publishes how many new people have tested positive, how many people are in the hospital and how many people died. Honestly, I've never been very interested in the number of positive tests. At first they were limiting who could get tested, then they were encouraging lots of folks to test. I think one thing everyone agrees on is that lots of people have been infected who have never tested positive.
The hospitalization numbers, on the other hand, I have found to be interesting. In Louisiana, hospitalizations peaked at 2084 on April 11. Ventilator use peaked on April 3, at 571. In March, about 1/3 of those who were hospitalized were on ventilators. The percent of hospital patients on ventilators peaked on March 27, when 36% of hospitalized patients were on ventilators, and it has been falling ever since. Less than 15% of hospitalized patients were on ventilators by the middle of May, and looking at the dates between May 12 and May 24, about 12% of hospitalized patients are on ventilators--so much for the idea that we needed to stockpile them and that they were going to save us in this crisis.
The day with the highest number of deaths was April 13 when 2034 people were hospitalized. I was curious about how the deaths compared to the hospitalized people. If you divide the day's deaths but its hospitalized population, between March 23 and April 12, on average 2.8% of the patients died each day. The worst day was March 31 when 3.9% of the patients died. Between April 13 and May 13, an average of 2.83% of the hospitalized people died each day. Ten of days between April 13 and April 30 were above that average,whereas from May 1 to May 13, only 4 were. It seems that they are getting a better handle on how to treat it--either that, or less sick people are being admitted to the hospital.
Update: Between May 12 and May 24, an average of 2.3% of the hospitalized people died each day. In the first seven days, five were above that average, in the last seven days, only two were.
Update: Between May 12 and May 24, an average of 2.3% of the hospitalized people died each day. In the first seven days, five were above that average, in the last seven days, only two were.
What I'd Like to Know
I've left comments on the paper's facebook page with questions I'd like to know the answers to, but was told they report the data they get from the state. I know some of the numbers I'd like to see may not be flattering to one hospital or the other or may be considered invasive of the privacy of people, but nevertheless, here are some things I'd like to know:
What's the total number of people who have been hospitalized for Covid-19 since this began? Were all the dead in the hospital? How long was the average patient hospitalized for? Has that changed over the last two months? Obviously, ventilators are a lot smaller part of the treatment than they once were. What other changes have been made in managing this disease? Have the death rates among the hospitalized gotten better--in other words is my analysis close to correct about that?
Honestly, I really don't care how many people are getting "the crud". If Covid-19, absent a swab, would be nothing to a particular patient but another seasonal virus that made him or her feel lousy for a few days, I have a hard time getting concerned about it--yes, I know transmission is an issue, but the reality is we will never know how many people have been infected with this. It appears that there are people who are infected an never have symptoms. There are obviously people who are infected and have never been diagnosed. That's the main reason I chose to focus on hospitalization numbers rather than case numbers.
Honestly, I really don't care how many people are getting "the crud". If Covid-19, absent a swab, would be nothing to a particular patient but another seasonal virus that made him or her feel lousy for a few days, I have a hard time getting concerned about it--yes, I know transmission is an issue, but the reality is we will never know how many people have been infected with this. It appears that there are people who are infected an never have symptoms. There are obviously people who are infected and have never been diagnosed. That's the main reason I chose to focus on hospitalization numbers rather than case numbers.